Removal from the queue for housing improvement. Grounds for removal from the queue for improvement of living conditions

The Supreme Court made an important decision regarding the notorious housing queue for beneficiaries. It gives great hope to those whom officials are trying to exclude from those waiting for a roof over their heads.

The longest queues in our country are queues to get an apartment. The wait for a state apartment for our citizens is stretched out not even for years - for decades. The changes that have taken place in the country have seriously reduced the number of people on the waiting list - those who have the right to receive free housing from the state. But they didn’t reduce the deadlines; they are still huge.

Today, according to experts, more than a million people in the country are waiting for the coveted square meters. In some regions the queue is longer, in others shorter, but it lasts for years for everyone.

For our citizens included in such lists, losing their place in line is a real tragedy. The verdict of the Supreme Court, which considered the complaint of a woman removed from the waiting list, explained to lower courts and officials who should not be deprived of a place in the queue.

This story about a place in the housing queue began with a trial. A resident of the capital filed a claim with the district court against the prefecture of the Eastern District of Moscow. The woman asked the court to force officials to restore her registration file and return her to the queue for improved housing conditions.

She and her daughter were placed in this queue by a decision of local authorities back in 1980. A Muscovite and her child were recognized as in need of improved living conditions due to the fact that the two of them huddled together in one room of a two-room communal apartment, where conditions were, to put it mildly, poor.

While decades of waiting dragged on for this small family, the girl grew up, finished school, went to work and got married. Officials reacted to this joyful event almost instantly and in a very unique way - by order of the prefect, the family was immediately removed from the register to improve their living conditions.

The officials explained their step to the woman simply - the girl got married, and her young husband has a three-room apartment where he is registered with his parents. There, judging by the square meters, there is enough space for everyone, including the young wife. Well, the person on the waiting list, who now lives alone in the room, can no longer count on improvement, since her square meters are in complete order.

The woman did not agree with such official calculations and went to the district court. But her first trial ended unsuccessfully - the former wait-list lost to the officials. The city court also sided with the prefecture.

However, the Supreme Court categorically disagreed with such verdicts. So how did the Supreme Court reason? The court found that the young husband never moved into his mother-in-law’s room and did not lay claim to her housing. He is registered in his parents’ apartment, which, by the way, belongs to them as property. Therefore, even after marriage, he did not acquire any rights to his mother-in-law's room.

The daughter of the waiter found herself in the same situation. She, as the Supreme Court emphasized, did not move into her husband’s parents’ own apartment, did not acquire the right to use someone else’s square meters, but continued to use the housing, the tenant of which is her mother.

The young people, as the court emphasized, took advantage of their legal right to choose their place of residence, which is written in the Family Code, and each remained to live at their previous place of residence.

Based on this, the plaintiff’s daughter did not become a member of her husband’s family, and her husband did not legally become a member of the family of the tenant of the room in the communal apartment.

From this, the Supreme Court concluded that the Muscovite’s living conditions did not change after the employer’s daughter got married. Therefore, she was unreasonably removed from the housing register.

Having finished analyzing this case, the Judicial Collegium for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court took another very important step. She did not, as she usually does, overturn the decisions of the lower courts and ask them to reconsider the case taking into account their explanations. This time the Supreme Court said that it would make the necessary decision itself. He overturned the verdicts of the district and city courts and made a new decision, which satisfied all the demands made by the Muscovite.

(Definition of the Judicial Collegium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 5-B11-59)

dossier "RG"

The right to housing for citizens of the Russian Federation is guaranteed by Article 40 of the Russian Constitution.

A prerequisite for obtaining the right to a free apartment is the recognition of citizens as low-income and in need of housing. According to Article 51 of the Housing Code, those in need are citizens who do not have housing at all or who are provided with a total area per person that is less than the accounting norm. Also among those in need are those citizens whose housing is recognized as unfit for habitation. Those living in an apartment occupied by several families also fall into this category, if the family has a patient suffering from a severe form of a chronic disease, in which living together is impossible, and who do not have other living quarters.

According to the latest data from Rosstat, more than 2.6 million Russian families are officially in need of improved housing conditions. At the current rate of issuing apartments, many of them will receive free “square meters” from the state only by 2037. Some will not receive it at all. After all, instead of building social meters, the authorities today are following the path of least cost: citizens are massively removed from the lists under fictitious pretexts, sometimes openly violating the law. Lawyer Oleg Sukhov (Legal Center of Lawyer Oleg Sukhov) talks about what tricks officials most often resort to in trying to “thin out” the queue for housing.

1st place: accounting of personal property of spouses and distant relatives

Our civil servants have put this simple but effective scheme into practice long ago. The bottom line is this: officials carefully check the immediate and distant relatives of an applicant for a free apartment, and if they find someone’s property, they take its area into account when determining the applicant’s living conditions. An unexpected “increase” can be anything: from the premarital “one-room apartment” of a former son-in-law to the village house of an aunt from Uryupinsk. As soon as the total square footage reaches the standards, the person on the waiting list and his family are removed from the register. After all, in order to maintain a place on the coveted list, citizens must really need government meters. For example, not having your own corner at all or huddling in a very small room. Let's say, in Moscow and the region, accounting standards are no more than 10 square meters. m per person (for communal apartments - 15 sq. m).

At the same time, the authorities diligently ignore the fact that the owner of the additional “squares” is registered in another place and has nothing to do with the housing queue, and those on the waiting list themselves do not have the right to use his property. A typical case: citizen K. lives in a wooden barracks with her parents and will soon receive an apartment from the state. Her husband is registered in his own cottage, purchased long before the wedding, and does not count on his wife’s social standards. According to the law, in such a situation the husband’s personal property cannot be taken into account, which means that everyone must remain to their own. But the Moscow City Property Department decided differently: those in need were excluded from the list, and in order to be restored, they had to go to court.

Or here's an even more absurd story. A Muscovite is registered in a communal apartment with two children and has been on a waiting list for housing since the mid-nineties. After 23 years of waiting, the department suddenly “dismissed” her. It turned out that city hall employees added 34 square meters. m of the applicant's house of her cousin with an area of 180 sq. m. m. As a result, according to the documents, there were 214 “square meters” for four people, and the need to improve conditions at the expense of the budget disappeared. However, the former wait-list managed to convince the court that she did not move her brother into her communal apartment, which means he is not a member of her family. Neither the plaintiff nor her children have any shares in the ownership of the relative’s real estate. As a result, the order of the city authorities was declared illegal.

2nd place: accounting of premises unsuitable for habitation

Another no less popular way to illegally remove a person from the register is to add to his living space the footage of a dacha, garden house, or even a plot of land. In many regions of the country, including Moscow, this procedure has been brought to the point of automaticity: as soon as a citizen acquires a dacha building or plot of land and registers ownership in Rosreestr, the new property is immediately added to his old squares, and the unlucky owner is deprived of the right to a state apartment, explains the lawyer Oleg Sukhov. The person on the waiting list has to prove that the property is in fact unsuitable for permanent residence in court. Recently, a resident of the Moscow region became a participant in such a process. The father of a low-income family inherited a classic “village house”: in a garden community, without running water or sewerage, but with stove heating. They decided to use the object as a summer cottage. The officials, without hesitation, took the premises into account as acceptable housing and removed the applicant from the queue. The court did not agree with this position, pointing out that according to current legislation, a house without amenities cannot be used when determining the level of security for those on the waiting list, and overturned the municipality’s decision.

3rd place: overestimation of the communal area due to the corridor

Another striking example of bureaucratic ingenuity. The authorities first tried this technique on a large scale a couple of years ago in Moscow. Then, entire floors of former departmental dormitories began to be converted into communal apartments for 20-60 families, and common areas were divided proportionally between tenants. As a result, “squares” of corridors, kitchens, bathrooms and elevator halls were added to the footage of the rooms themselves, and the municipality entered into social tenancy agreements for these non-existent enlarged premises. According to the documents, the tenants were fully provided with living space and lost the right to receive a separate apartment.

So, after the “corridor reform,” a resident of one of the capital’s communal apartments, living in a 12-meter room, suddenly had an extra 10 square meters. m. On this basis, the City Property Department removed the woman from the register, and the courts of the first and second instances agreed with this. The case reached the Supreme Court, which took the side of the queue and overturned the previous verdicts. The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation emphasized that the plaintiff had not actually improved her living conditions since moving in, and the flattened part of the corridor does not make her less in need of normal housing. The mayor's office had to reinstate the Muscovite in the queue.

4th place: refusal due to improved financial situation

The new Housing Code, which came into force in 2005, allowed the provision of free apartments only to those in need who were officially recognized as low-income. In practice, this means that in order to receive social benefits, a family must not only live in cramped conditions, but also have no valuable property, and also earn so little that they will not be able to save up for real estate in 20 years. Moreover, the condition applies to the entire time of standing in line,” notes lawyer Oleg Sukhov. If, a few years after being included in the list, the applicant gets a good job and climbs out of poverty, he will automatically be excluded. Officials use the rule to their advantage. On the one hand, it is completely legal and very active to expel new people on the waiting list. On the other hand, they are illegally applying the changed order to the old ones. The fact is that, according to the norms of the Housing Code, the property qualification does not apply to those who registered before March 1, 2005. Accordingly, it is impossible to remove such people from the queue just because they have improved their financial situation. Nevertheless, officials do it. Contrary to the law, common sense and numerous court decisions. A recent example from the Tula region: a couple had been waiting for an apartment since 1998, the two of them living on 18.5 square meters. m. Last fall, those on the waiting list were removed from the list due to the fact that his wife retired. Local authorities decided that now the family's income should be enough to buy housing, and predictably lost the process.

According to housing legislation, certain categories of citizens have the right to receive housing from the state free of charge. To be placed on a waiting list for housing, you need to collect a fairly large package of documents and submit it to the authorized body. But if, after going through this difficult procedure, citizens are removed from the queue for housing - what to do? Is it possible to stand up again and expect to receive it? Or is it necessary to proceed in a different way?

Grounds for removal from the queue for improvement of living conditions

The rights to obtain living space are retained by citizens only until a reason is identified for which they cannot be registered and will be removed.
In accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation, citizens can be removed from the queue in the following cases:

They submitted a corresponding application on their own initiative (when a citizen himself asks to be deregistered, there is no need to indicate a reason);
When the basis on which they should have been provided with housing under a social tenancy agreement was lost. For example, the financial condition of the family has been improved and it is no longer considered poor - when an inheritance was received that improved the financial condition, a promotion was received, etc.;
When moving to another region or country (but when it comes to moving within the city, the place in the queue is retained and the citizen cannot be removed on these grounds);
If financial assistance was issued for the construction of a house or the purchase of an apartment, the citizen also cannot apply for living space;
When, after registering in the queue for an apartment, it turned out that the information provided by citizens turned out to be unreliable;
Upon dismissal from the enterprise from which the space was to be allocated, the citizen also cannot claim it in the future;
In case of deliberate deterioration of living conditions in order to obtain living space;
When citizens purchase a dacha that has been recognized as suitable for year-round living;

After one of the above circumstances has been identified, employees of the authorized body (in this case, the Department of Housing Policy) make a decision within 30 days to remove the person from the queue for housing. This decision must contain information about the reasons why the dequeue occurred. But what to do when citizens are removed from the queue for no reason? Is it possible to prove that you are right and be reinstated? Where should I go for recovery?

Procedure for removing from the queue

When a citizen is removed from the queue without reason, he must act as follows:

Contact the authorized body with a written application to provide information about the reason for the withdrawal. Based on the application, employees of the authorized body are required to provide a written response explaining why the citizen cannot apply for living space.
When it follows from the response that it was withdrawn without reason (or no explanation was given to the request and the authorized body did not provide the necessary response), then it is necessary to file a claim in court and defend your rights in court.

Preparing a claim

The claim must contain the following information:

The name of the court in which it is filed;
Full name of the plaintiff, his telephone number and residential address;
Information about the defendant (name of organization), address, contact telephone numbers;
Information about your current place of residence;
The basis on which the person was registered as needing housing and the date on which this was done;
The date on which the person learned that he had been deregistered;
A request to declare the defendant’s actions illegal;
Request for reinstatement;
Date of filing the claim;
Signature.

The claim will need to be accompanied by a package of documents confirming the veracity of the applicant’s words. Depending on the situation, the list of required documents varies.

The original receipt for payment of the state fee (a copy will not work - the judge’s office will not accept a claim with a copy);
Printout from your personal bank account;
Copies of birth certificates of minor children;
Extract from the house register.

Consideration of the case in court

This category of cases is subject to consideration by the district court - the completed claim must be sent there. It is possible to file a claim on your own or with the help of specialists in this field, but given that housing legislation is one of the most complex, especially when it comes to obtaining residential premises, most citizens prefer to seek the help of lawyers. Lawyers will not only help you draw up a claim, but will also represent the client’s interests in the process (including when an appeal is required), as well as in other government bodies, which will significantly increase the chance of a positive decision.
If you have been removed from the queue without reason and you need help in asserting your housing rights, you can contact our specialists at the specified contacts. We have many years of experience in successful work and can guarantee high-quality results! Our specialists will represent your interests and achieve your reinstatement on the list for an apartment.

Removing certain categories of citizens from the queue for housing is a procedure that is carried out by forces and specialized checks of some competent commissions. It is they, these commissions, that refuse to receive housing, while indicating the reasons for this refusal.

Of course, subsequently citizens have every right to challenge the decision to refuse to provide housing, but in order to do this, it is recommended to seek the help of a lawyer competent in these matters.

Why is it important to contact a lawyer to challenge removal from the housing queue?

It is important not only to seek the help of a lawyer competent in these matters, but also to prepare the necessary questions, the answers to which may be useful in the event of a trial in disputes relating to the removal of a category of citizens from the queue for residential premises.

Detailed legal advice in Moscow is an excellent solution for those who need not only to protect their civil rights to housing within the framework of belonging to the category of citizens, but also for those who need to defend and return their rights given by law to the provision of housing space to live in further.

What can a lawyer do?

Within the framework of his own competence, a legal specialist will be able to provide the following types and types of assistance to those categories of citizens who, for whatever reason, have been removed from the queue for the provision of living space:

Analysis of the situation. Before considering a case and finding answers to questions about why they can be removed from the queue, a qualified and experienced lawyer is obliged, within the framework of his competence, to analyze the situation, as well as determine the reasons on the basis of which a citizen or a group of Russian citizens was removed from the state register for the provision of housing from the state. It should be noted that each case is unique, and that is why, to investigate the reasons for refusal to provide housing, the best option would be to contact a qualified lawyer. Without his help and detailed advice on the issues of ruling and removing citizens from the provision of housing from the state, it will be very difficult to protect their rights, as well as prove that the applicant has every right to restore his status to receive living space;
Collection of documents. Another important duty of a lawyer, without which not a single legal consultation in Moscow takes place, is the collection of the necessary documentation and information data to challenge the decision to deregister citizens. With the right approach, as well as by collecting all the necessary documents, it is possible to achieve not only a review of the decision regarding deregistration, but also a review of the dispute in court;
Consultation. Consultation with a qualified lawyer is one of the most popular types of legal assistance today. As part of the legal consultation, the lawyer will be able to consider various situations, solutions and methods for protecting the interests of his client, as well as answer all questions asked during the consultation. Thanks to the consultation of an experienced legal specialist, you can increase the chance of a positive solution within the framework of an ongoing legal dispute regarding the deregistration of a citizen or group of citizens for the provision of residential premises in Moscow.
Personal representation. In addition to legal advice, which can help resolve any issues, as well as provide all the information necessary for defense and further disputes within the framework of legal proceedings, a lawyer will be able to provide personal representation services. Personal representation of a lawyer in court proceedings is one of the main points that helps a party not only protect interests, but also set them aside in accordance with the court hearing of this instance. Moreover, within the framework of legal advice, you can understand how to challenge the removal from the queue for residential premises for various categories of citizens or families who apply for space in accordance with the norms and articles of the current legislation (according to the Housing Code in force in Russia, namely according to article under number 188);
Appeal. In the event that the arguments that were presented as part of the judicial proceedings were not convincing enough, which is why the judge made a negative decision, a qualified lawyer will be able to prepare all the necessary documents in order to appeal the decision in a higher court.

For what reasons can they be removed from the housing queue?

Citizens may be excluded from registration in order to receive housing if the situation, actions or actions of a citizen or citizens are regulated by article number 56 of the Housing Code of Russia. According to this article, the following citizens may be excluded from the list of citizens who can receive housing under the state program:
Those who sent an official refusal to receive living space. Refusal may be caused by moving outside of Russia, as well as by exchanging an apartment for another, larger one. There could also be other reasons;
Loss of one or more grounds according to which the right of a citizen or several citizens to receive living space based on a social rental agreement, justified from the point of view of current legislation, is granted. As an example, we can note the improvement in the personal financial situation of one or more close relatives (in particular, family members). As for the amount of earnings, it should be higher than the earnings for citizens belonging to the group of low-income people established in accordance with Article 49 of the Housing Code of Russia;
Relocation of a citizen or several citizens to some other place. In the event that the address of the new place of residence changes, but does not go beyond the territorial boundaries of the region, then the priority and the right to it will not change. In the same case, if a family is sent to the territory of another region, then it is automatically excluded from the general queue of those families who have the right to receive living space at the expense of state support;
Also excluded from the queue are those citizens who have received funds for the subsequent construction of a house or the acquisition of living space in Moscow;
During the process of registration and placing on the queue, citizens indicated inaccurate information about themselves, but they were registered to receive living space at the expense of public funds (such information, the incorrect indication of which may be the reason for which they can be removed from the queue, includes: incorrect indication of the number of members of one family living in the same residential area, incorrect information regarding the health of one or more family members, illegal certificates indicating that the family is low-income).

An important point: according to the Housing Code of Russia, namely article number 56, only the company that registered citizens has the right to remove people from the register and the queue for housing.

If a citizen, several people or a family who applied to receive an apartment or other type of living space under a government program was removed from the queue without explanation, you should seek the advice of a legal specialist.

A qualified lawyer with experience will be able to determine how to challenge the removal from the queue, and will also be able to take all necessary measures to ensure that a citizen, several citizens or a family are restored to their official rights and data in accordance with current legislation.

Why is it important to contact a lawyer for help?

In addition, if you have to go to court in case of disputes or controversial situations, only a qualified and experienced lawyer in such matters will be able to provide truly high-quality and tangible assistance, regardless of the current situation, and also regardless of what evidence was presented from both sides . This indicates the competence, as well as the level of experience and knowledge of a lawyer with sufficient competence and qualifications.

Of course, you can always resolve issues on your own, but resolving such issues on your own during a trial may not always bring positive results.

Important! For all questions about being removed from the housing queue, if you don’t know what to do and where to contact:

Call 8-800-777-32-63.

Housing lawyers, and lawyers who are registered on Russian Legal Portal, will try to help you from a practical point of view in the current issue and advise you on all issues of interest.

Creation: 04/19/2011

Update: 11/02/2018

“You weren’t standing here!” - a familiar phrase, isn’t it? It was the most common in queues during the shortage period. However, with the disappearance of the era of shortages, the queues did not disappear, and this is what we will talk about, perhaps the most exciting queue for legitimate square meters of housing.

Don’t waste time if you find out that you have been taken off the waiting list for housing!

Receive a copy of the order to remove from the queue, collect other documents and submit an application to the court.

So, you have been taken off the housing queue!

Recently, cases of citizens being removed from housing registration have become more frequent; in other words, they have been “removed from the queue for housing...”.

Once upon a time (already in the last century!) one citizen and his family were put on a waiting list for improved living conditions, or, simply put, on a waiting list for housing. The citizen was delighted, he was standing in line, he brought the necessary documents upon request, he raised his children, he waited for an apartment for 10 years, 15 years, 20 years... How long can I wait, the citizen thinks, I’ll go and find out if my turn for housing will come soon. He still doesn’t know that he was taken off the housing queue!

Our citizen comes to the City Property Department and finds out that he has been removed from the queue because the grounds for his being on the housing register have disappeared. So his family will have to continue living in a communal apartment. So what if there are 7 people in one room.

As Nekrasov figuratively writes:

And they went, they were scorched by the sun,
Repeating: “God judge him!”
throwing up his hands hopelessly...

This is how our citizens go...

But we won't follow them. We will go to court and file a corresponding statement of claim. And we will have the opportunity to be reinstated in the housing queue. If we find reasons for this.

Therefore, if you have been removed from the housing queue, we will restore it!

Firstly– you must receive a written order to be removed from the housing queue (if you did not receive this order by mail). Such orders in Moscow are currently issued by the Moscow City Property Department. You must contact the Department with an application, after which you should be given a copy of the order within 10 days.
Secondly– we are drawing up a statement of claim to the court, in which we ask that the above-mentioned order be declared illegal and oblige the Department to reinstate you in the queue for housing.
Third- we submit a prepared statement of claim to the court to protect our violated rights.

From the moment a citizen receives order that he was removed from the housing queue , he has the right appeal it to the court within the procedure established by law.

We are inviting the City Property Department of the City of Moscow (for Moscow) to participate in the case as a defendant.

Deadline for appealing an order to remove you from the housing queue

The limitation period is 3 years. However, you should not wait this time; go to court as soon as you find out that you have been removed from the queue for housing.

Often the reasons for removal from the housing queue are far-fetched, which is why the courts recognize orders to remove from the housing queue as illegal.

If the court finds the order to remove you from the housing queue to be illegal, then with the received court decision that has entered into legal force, you need to go to the body that issued this illegal order and restore the housing queue.

Citizen will be restored on the housing register (on the waiting list for housing) from the date of its initial production.

If 3 months are missed, what should I do?

They removed me from the queue without notifying me of this, neither in writing nor verbally. I found out about this after much more than 3 months.

It is necessary to go to court in the manner of claim proceedings, which is provided for by the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The limitation period is 3 years.

Remember yourself and advise your friends who are in line for housing

At least once a year, find out how your queue is moving there, to see if there are any unpleasant surprises!

Does it happen that it was removed legally and is there a chance in this case?

In my practice, there have been cases when removal from the housing queue was legal. For example:

Changing of the living place- if you have moved permanently to another city or region;
Purchasing housing, receiving housing by gift or inheritance, if as a result of this, the persons on the waiting list were provided with housing according to the provision rate;
When transferring subsidies for the purchase of housing in accordance with the established procedure.

In these cases, it is unlikely that you will be able to restore the housing queue, but it is better to consult with an experienced lawyer or lawyer. On your own, you may not be able to understand the issue of legality/illegality of removal from the housing queue.

The main stages of protecting your rights in restoring the queue for housing

Preparation of documents
You will need the following documents:

Order to remove from the queue (it comes by mail, or you receive it from the Department);
Notice of housing registration (given to you when you were put on the waiting list);
An extract from the house register, a copy of the financial and personal account, a single housing document (obtain from the MFC);
Documents for the apartment (social tenancy agreement or certificate of ownership);
Receipt for payment of the state duty (see paragraph 7, paragraph 1, article 333.19 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation)

Preparing and submitting an application to the court

Prepare and submit an application to the court. To do this, use the sample on our website and instructions for preparing and submitting an application and draw it up yourself, or seek help from a lawyer.

Trial.

After the court has accepted your application, go to court at every hearing and defend your rights.
Or contact a lawyer for help.

Sample documents for restoring the queue for housing

Attention!

Sample documents are provided for reference. You are responsible for completing and using them yourself.

Summary. Still on the fence?

From the author's practice

As my practice shows, citizens are often removed from the housing queue without sufficient grounds, that is, illegally. However, in this situation, there is no need to write complaints about being removed from the queue for housing to the mayor’s office, the government, the president personally on Twitter, or to any human rights organizations.

From experience, this is a waste of time. Receive an unsubscribe, at best a ghostly hope, but most importantly: you will miss the deadline for appealing the order to be removed from the housing queue in court and miss the opportunity to protect your rights, sometimes completely. And the fact that you have been removed from the queue for housing will become a harsh reality.

First, consult with a lawyer or lawyer and tell him about the nuances of your problem and the sooner the better.

On May 15, 2018, in the Presnensky District Court of Moscow, it was possible to obtain the cancellation of the order of the City Property Department to remove a family of four from the housing register.

The mother and three children were registered as needing improved housing conditions in 1998.

In November 2017, by order of the Moscow City Department of State Inspection, they were removed from the housing register. The DGI considered that, taking into account the residential premises, those members of the applicants’ family who are not
housing registration, the family is provided with housing according to the standard of 18 sq.m. per person, in connection with which he issued an appropriate order.

The applicants did not agree with the order, so they decided to use a lawyer.

They turned to me.

After analyzing the available documents and relevant judicial practice, a statement of claim was prepared to recognize the order to remove the person from the housing queue as illegal and to restore him to the housing register.

At the court hearing, we supported the stated demands and asked to satisfy them.

The court listened to our position, studied the materials of the requested accounting file and satisfied the stated requirements in full.